Skip to main content
TPDI logo
Back to Layer 6

Capability 6.2.3

Regulatory & Oversight Capability

Definition

The institutional capacity of regulators and oversight bodies to implement, monitor and enforce AI-related laws and standards. Encompasses skills, resources, coordination mechanisms, and innovation-friendly approaches such as regulatory sandboxes.

Examples

  • Singapore AI verify and Personal Data Protection Commission model framework
  • United Kingdom Digital Regulation Cooperation Forum integration with AI Security Institute
  • ACCC Digital Platforms
  • ASIC RegTech Sandbox
  • OAIC
  • eSafety.

Indicators

  • Number of regulators with explicit AI mandate / strategy
  • Existence of a national AI Safety Institute
  • Cross-regulator coordination mechanism
  • AI incident reporting obligations
  • Percentage of staff with AI expertise and investment in AI capability building
  • Number of regulators with dedicated AI technical units/advisory panels
  • Availability of regulatory toolkits or guidance for AI
  • Number of AI-related investigations and reporting

National AI Plan

PLAN COMMITMENT

Limited commitment

Commits to Australia's existing laws being 'actively enforced' and to the establishment of the AISI, including to support informed, timely and cohesive regulatory action, including by supporting existing regulators to ensure AI companies are compliant with Australian law and uphold legal standards of fairness and transparency (Action 7). But includes no new funding for already stretched regulators. Limited commitment by government is a missed opportunity to increase domestic maturity in a globally scarce capability with high public interest value.

Stocktake

Is the Stocktake missing evidence?

Share additional information for potential future Assessments